<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR-II review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/</link>
	<description>Musings of a fashion photographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 07:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22707</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 07:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/?p=113#comment-22707</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg. Thanks very much for the review which I found better than any other reviews other there. I was wondering whether I should switch my lens but I think I am going to stick with old 70-200mm for now. Interestingly, I found images taken with my 70-200mm at 70mm better than thouse of 24-70mm at 70mm. Accordingly to Nikon&#039;s MTF, this shouldn&#039;t be the case and I was pulling my hairs try to figure out what went wrong with my 24-70mm. I am glad it looks like it is not my lens after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg. Thanks very much for the review which I found better than any other reviews other there. I was wondering whether I should switch my lens but I think I am going to stick with old 70-200mm for now. Interestingly, I found images taken with my 70-200mm at 70mm better than thouse of 24-70mm at 70mm. Accordingly to Nikon&#8217;s MTF, this shouldn&#8217;t be the case and I was pulling my hairs try to figure out what went wrong with my 24-70mm. I am glad it looks like it is not my lens after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hind</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22684</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/?p=113#comment-22684</guid>
		<description>I tried out the VRII at my local store after reading your review.  With my style the shortened reach isn&#039;t a problem after all, so I bought one!!  Stunning lens, I recommend potential buyers check it out in relation to their style, as it may not be a problem.

The sharpness and VR are excellent, with virtually no vignetting (unless I shoot a blank wall!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried out the VRII at my local store after reading your review.  With my style the shortened reach isn&#8217;t a problem after all, so I bought one!!  Stunning lens, I recommend potential buyers check it out in relation to their style, as it may not be a problem.</p>
<p>The sharpness and VR are excellent, with virtually no vignetting (unless I shoot a blank wall!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hind</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/?p=113#comment-22682</guid>
		<description>Greg, great review, very helpfull. I need to think again about getting one. Like the higher contrast in backlit situations though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, great review, very helpfull. I need to think again about getting one. Like the higher contrast in backlit situations though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael de Gunst</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22643</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael de Gunst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/?p=113#comment-22643</guid>
		<description>Thanks, great review, minimum distance has always been my biggest problem by weddings, children and smal animals, So I stick to VR-I too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, great review, minimum distance has always been my biggest problem by weddings, children and smal animals, So I stick to VR-I too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/2009/12/10/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8g-vr-ii-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22637</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/blog/?p=113#comment-22637</guid>
		<description>Great review Greg, it answers a lot of questions. I think I&#039;m sticking with VR1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Greg, it answers a lot of questions. I think I&#8217;m sticking with VR1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
